NORTHEAST WIS. – State Senator Eric Wimberger (R-Oconto) and Representative Jim Piwowarczyk (R-Hubertus) have introduced Wisconsin Senate Bill 666/Assembly Bill 701, which would adopt the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act (UPEPA), brining long-overdue free speech protections for citizens and journalists in Wisconsin.
The Wisconsin Newspaper Association and this newspaper applaud Wimberger and Piwowarczyk for introducing SB 666/AB 701 and enthusiastically urge its passage. Designed to protect free speech and the right to petition the government, SB 666/AB701, will allow the courts to quickly dismiss lawsuits that are filed not to win on the merits, but to intimidate, silence, or financially exhaust critics.
So-called SLAPPs — Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation — are often used against individuals who speak out on matters of public concern, such as government accountability, tax and spending decisions, consumer protection, environmental impacts or workplace conditions. Even when these cases are weak or baseless, the cost and stress of litigation can be enough to deter people from speaking at all. Anti-SLAPP laws are intended to stop this abuse of the court system.
Under UPEPA legislation, which was developed by the nonpartisan Uniform Law Commission, a person who believes they are the target of a SLAPP lawsuit could ask the court to dismiss the case if it arises from their exercise of free speech or their right to petition on a public issue. If the court agrees, the lawsuit would be dismissed, and the party who filed it could be required to pay the defendant’s attorney fees and costs. The fee-shifting provision is critical, as it discourages the use of litigation as a weapon rather than a legitimate means of resolving disputes.
Wisconsin is currently behind much of the country in providing these protections. According to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 31 states have anti-SLAPP laws in place. As a result, journalists, activists and ordinary citizens in Wisconsin are more vulnerable to retaliatory lawsuits than their counterparts in other states.
Comments
No comments on this item Please log in to comment by clicking here